Simply, you're always mislead by the concept that scientists believe in science. We all scientists with sane minds don't believe in such a thing. We just believe that we may have beliefs on some subjects and it may be proved or disproved by some "human" (not "God's") activities and we are open-minded in such a debate (of course, it does not mean we are always right, it's just a problem of methodolgy to find the true/correct/right). This kind of thinking is, I think, quite different from those of belivers of some religion, don't you think so? Thus, we all scientists are on this track. If not, we can publish nothing. (publish = make public, or more than one scientist agree with such an opinion)