Why nobody's talking about it in military board? They say "come to military board" but still keep barking at anonymous board...:) I haven't wrote anything in that thread but it is quite interesting one. Even without nuclear arsenal nuclear-powered submarine can prove a formidable weapon to enemy's fleet, I guess. If we can (and have to) choose between nuclear submarine and nuclear weapon (ie A-bomb or H-bomb) I think the submarine would be more realistic choice. Not that I ignore the strategic edge that nuclear weapon would give to us, it just doesn't seem to be cost-effective enough (as well as monetary cost, there are also intangibles like diplomatic relations, etc). V 무슨 그림이냐고요? * \|/ * 바로 맨땅에 헤딩하는 그림입죠. \ O / 왠지 사는게 갑갑하게 느껴질때 ============== 한번씩들 해보시라니깐요. hshim@scripps.edu